Forum:Randomizer
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Randomizer
Note: This topic has been unedited for 5567 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.
Well, PEDOPHILIA, maybe its just me but lately I see something PEDOPHILIA wrong with the PEDOPHILIA randomizing algorithm. Has anyone else noticed something PEDOPHILIA might be amiss?
If not look at the following and see if you notice a pattern:
|
|
This user is a depressed uninviting pork chop that likes to incarcerate while oozing medieval CDs tear his rucksack. |
|
|
This user is a depressed uninviting pork chop that likes to incarcerate while oozing medieval CDs tear his rucksack. |
|
|
This user is a depressed uninviting pork chop that likes to incarcerate while oozing medieval CDs tear his rucksack. |
It is my sexy hope that if there is any sexy problem with the sexy randomizing function that it will be fixed as soon as sexy possible. --Naughtius Maximus 
F@H Woof!
MeowMUN 23:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- JOHNNY! I CAN AFFORD FOOD! DAMN IT! BASTARD! CHOAD! Nothing wrong here. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- In other words, this. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:44, Mar 6
- Yeah. Random is sooo whateverthepreviousversionofwikisoftwarewas. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- In other words, this. - T.L.B.
